Recommendation for OpenClaw

OpenClaw

Our top recommendation for OpenClaw, based on the public evidence we track, is OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol.[1][2] Use for advisor or watchdog roles where it blocks and reviews rather than executes long sequences, as its #4 agentic arena ranking (score 7.1) indicates solid tool-calling fundamentals for shorter interactions. Watch out: Avoid for always-on agent loops: it can enter uncontrolled thinking loops ('Fix 1, Fix 2... Fix 81'), ignore AGENTS.md instructions, and corrupt plan files in Omp deployments. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 is the next-ranked alternative.

About this recommendation

Updated
Sep 25, 2026
Evidence through
Sep 25, 2026
Sources
4
Revision
v70

Decision audit

Why this result

Inspect the inputs and the computed order behind the recommendation.

Models screened

20

live candidates

Evaluation feeds

6

task-weighted

Winner coverage

79%

intended feed weight

Largest provider share

2 of 3

OpenAI

Established source breadth. 4 citation families and 2 practitioner families support the top result; 1 cautionary thread is retained. The largest citation family contributes 50%.

Sources evaluated

The task sets these weights before any model is scored.

winner: GPT-5.6 Sol
Evaluation feedWeightWinner resultField measured
Berkeley Function Calling
32%
not measured3/20
LMArena Agent
23%
#416/20
price weight
15%
99/10020/20
Terminal-Bench 2.1
15%
#1511/20
SWE-rebench
10%
#415/20
OpenRouter usage
5%
97/10020/20

Provider concentration

Each exact model is scored separately; provider identity is not a ranking input.

OpenAI67%
  • OpenAI2 models
  • Anthropic1 model

Decision table

Every published model is shown in computed order. Practitioner sources are distinct community threads, not the citations repeated in the prose below.

RankModelRelative scoreCoveragePractitioner evidenceStrongest measured reason
01GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
77
79%3 threads · 2 families · 1 cautions#4 LMArena Agent · #4 SWE-rebench
02Claude Fable 5Anthropic
72
79%no linked practitioner threads#1 SWE-rebench · #2 LMArena Agent
03GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
71
79%3 threads · 3 families · 1 cautions#4 Terminal-Bench 2.1 · #20 LMArena Agent

Relative score combines normalized benchmark quality and signal coverage; independent practitioner evidence and freshness are bounded tie-breakers. It is an ordering score, not an absolute quality percentage. The writing model receives this order and cannot change it.

  1. GPT-5.6 Sol ranks #4 on LMArena's agentic arena for tool-use and multi-step tasks, though community reports highlight instability in long-horizon loops and plan file corruption.

    Best when: Use for advisor or watchdog roles where it blocks and reviews rather than executes long sequences, as its #4 agentic arena ranking (score 7.1) indicates solid tool-calling fundamentals for shorter interactions.

    Tips

    • Use for advisor or watchdog roles where it blocks and reviews rather than executes long sequences, as its #4 agentic arena ranking (score 7.1) indicates solid tool-calling fundamentals for shorter interactions.
      Source 1
      “Ranks #4 of 36 on LMArena's agentic arena (score 7.1), measuring tool-use and multi-step task performance from human preference.”
      LMArena agentic arenaOpen original ↗
      Source 2
      “I tried in Omp (Oh-my-pi), and so far it's really problematic. It will loop in thinking mode ("Let me implement those fixes: Fix 1, Fix 2, Fix 3 .... Fix 80, Fix 81"), ignore the AGENTS.md instructions, corrupt plan files, etc etc... I have 5.6 Sol as advisor watchdog, and it blocks every turn, I never saw this. Quite a shame, 4.6 wasn't so bad.”

    Watch out for

    • Avoid for always-on agent loops: it can enter uncontrolled thinking loops ('Fix 1, Fix 2... Fix 81'), ignore AGENTS.md instructions, and corrupt plan files in Omp deployments.
      Source 2
      “I tried in Omp (Oh-my-pi), and so far it's really problematic. It will loop in thinking mode ("Let me implement those fixes: Fix 1, Fix 2, Fix 3 .... Fix 80, Fix 81"), ignore the AGENTS.md instructions, corrupt plan files, etc etc... I have 5.6 Sol as advisor watchdog, and it blocks every turn, I never saw this. Quite a shame, 4.6 wasn't so bad.”
    • Check your OpenClaw transport setup: Responses Lite mode requires client-side `web.run` extensions, so hosted tool configurations will fail without explicit client handling.
      Source 3
      “## Environment - sub2api: current `main` (`f18f3143e` during reproduction) - Codex CLI: `0.145.0` - Client transport: custom API-key Responses provider pointing at sub2api - Codex config: `web_search = "live"` - Affected models: `gpt-5.6-sol`, `gpt-5.6-terra`, `gpt-5.6-luna` ## Problem The Codex model catalog marks the three GPT-5.6 models above with `use_responses_lite=true`. In Responses Lite mode, Codex removes hosted Responses tools and expects a client-side `web.run` extension instead. For…”
      Lang-code-opsOpen original ↗
  2. Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 ranks #2 of 36 on LMArena's agentic arena (score 8.8), measuring tool-use and multi-step task performance from human preference.

    Best when: Consider only after reviewing the cited caution.

  3. GPT-5.6 Luna ranks near bottom of LMArena's agentic arena (#18, score -0.4) and shows high failure rates on patch-heavy operations in OpenCode workflows.

    Best when: Consider only after reviewing the cited caution.

    Watch out for

    • Do not use for implementation or fixer lanes with heavy patching: local audits show 239 failed `apply_patch` calls with 229 containing 'Failed' errors, far above acceptable thresholds.
      Source 4
      “## Summary The OpenAI preset currently sets `openai/gpt-5.6-luna` as default for both implementation-heavy lanes: - Designer: `medium` - Fixer: `xhigh` Local runs show a high number of `apply_patch` verification failures while using Luna. Could documentation and preset guidance be reviewed, with an alternative default or an explicit caveat for patch-heavy work? ## Local audit Observed across local OpenCode session history: - `gpt-5.6-luna`: 239 failed `apply_patch` calls - 229 contained `Failed…”
    • Verify your OpenClaw provider compatibility: like Sol and Terra, Luna uses Responses Lite mode which strips hosted tools and requires client-side `web.run` extensions.
      Source 3
      “## Environment - sub2api: current `main` (`f18f3143e` during reproduction) - Codex CLI: `0.145.0` - Client transport: custom API-key Responses provider pointing at sub2api - Codex config: `web_search = "live"` - Affected models: `gpt-5.6-sol`, `gpt-5.6-terra`, `gpt-5.6-luna` ## Problem The Codex model catalog marks the three GPT-5.6 models above with `use_responses_lite=true`. In Responses Lite mode, Codex removes hosted Responses tools and expects a client-side `web.run` extension instead. For…”
      Lang-code-opsOpen original ↗
    • Avoid as default for patch-heavy work: OpenCode presets currently mark Luna for 'medium' and 'xhigh' implementation lanes despite documented verification failures.
      Source 4
      “## Summary The OpenAI preset currently sets `openai/gpt-5.6-luna` as default for both implementation-heavy lanes: - Designer: `medium` - Fixer: `xhigh` Local runs show a high number of `apply_patch` verification failures while using Luna. Could documentation and preset guidance be reviewed, with an alternative default or an explicit caveat for patch-heavy work? ## Local audit Observed across local OpenCode session history: - `gpt-5.6-luna`: 239 failed `apply_patch` calls - 229 contained `Failed…”

Frequently asked

What is the top-ranked model for OpenClaw?
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol ranks first in the current evidence-weighted comparison. Use for advisor or watchdog roles where it blocks and reviews rather than executes long sequences, as its #4 agentic arena ranking (score 7.1) indicates solid tool-calling fundamentals for shorter interactions.[1][2]
What should I watch out for with OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol?
Avoid for always-on agent loops: it can enter uncontrolled thinking loops ('Fix 1, Fix 2... Fix 81'), ignore AGENTS.md instructions, and corrupt plan files in Omp deployments.[2]

Sources

  1. 1

    “Ranks #4 of 36 on LMArena's agentic arena (score 7.1), measuring tool-use and multi-step task performance from human preference.”

    LMArena agentic arena · Benchmark · Sep 15, 2026
  2. 2

    “I tried in Omp (Oh-my-pi), and so far it's really problematic. It will loop in thinking mode ("Let me implement those fixes: Fix 1, Fix 2, Fix 3 .... Fix 80, Fix 81"), ignore the AGENTS.md instructions, corrupt plan files, etc etc... I have 5.6 Sol as advisor watchdog, and it blocks every turn, I never saw this. Quite a shame, 4.6 wasn't so bad.”

    Saline9515 · Hacker News · Sep 21, 2026
  3. 3

    “## Environment - sub2api: current `main` (`f18f3143e` during reproduction) - Codex CLI: `0.145.0` - Client transport: custom API-key Responses provider pointing at sub2api - Codex config: `web_search = "live"` - Affected models: `gpt-5.6-sol`, `gpt-5.6-terra`, `gpt-5.6-luna` ## Problem The Codex model catalog marks the three GPT-5.6 models above with `use_responses_lite=true`. In Responses Lite mode, Codex removes hosted Responses tools and expects a client-side `web.run` extension instead. For…”

    Lang-code-ops · GitHub · Jul 27, 2026
  4. 4

    “## Summary The OpenAI preset currently sets `openai/gpt-5.6-luna` as default for both implementation-heavy lanes: - Designer: `medium` - Fixer: `xhigh` Local runs show a high number of `apply_patch` verification failures while using Luna. Could documentation and preset guidance be reviewed, with an alternative default or an explicit caveat for patch-heavy work? ## Local audit Observed across local OpenCode session history: - `gpt-5.6-luna`: 239 failed `apply_patch` calls - 229 contained `Failed…”

    ricatix · GitHub · Jul 28, 2026

Rankings synthesized from community evidence and open benchmarks. See methodology. Not driven by vendor marketing.